Court Rejects Ex-Minister Umar-Farouq’s Bid To Void Arrest Warrant

The FCT High Court in Abuja dismissed an application by former Minister of Humanitarian Affairs, Sadiya Umar-Farouq , to set aside an arrest warrant issued for her failure to appear in court. Judge Jude Onwuegbuzie upheld the warrant, ruling that the court is empowered to take such action when a defendant deliberately misses criminal proceedings.

Ms. Umar-Farouq faces prosecution by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) alongside Bashir Alkali and Sani Mohammed . They are accused of conspiracy, abuse of office, and misappropriating $1.3 million and ₦746.7 million in public funds.

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) expected the defendants to be arraigned in court on Monday, following an official statement by EFCC spokesperson Dele Oyewale. However, former Minister Sadiya Umar-Farouq failed to appear for the criminal proceedings.

In response, Judge Jude Onwuegbuzie rejected her legal team’s explanations, describing her absence as a willful failure to appear without a valid reason. The judge firmly ruled that because she was fully aware of the criminal proceedings and offered insufficient excuses, the court was legally empowered to issue a bench warrant for her immediate arrest.

“There is nothing in the exhibit explaining why the defendant who has mere arthritis and heart disease cannot appear before the court. Is it that there are no medical facilities in Nigeria? I am convinced that the 1st defendant is trying to hide behind her fingers by raising bogus excuses.

“It is important that the applicant be reminded that this is a criminal matter and not a civil one and there is an approach to its proceedings. By all legal considerations, I am of the opinion that there is no merit in this application. I so hold,” the judge declared.

Reacting to the ruling, lawyer to the EFCC, Rotimi Jacobs, who is a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), commended the court and urged it to enforce an earlier undertaking allegedly made by the former minister’s lead lawyer, A.A. Ibrahim, also SAN, to produce his client.

Mr Jacobs argued that the medical report submitted by the defence only requested six to eight weeks for Ms Farouq’s treatment and that the eight-week period expired on 9 June.

“My lordship, for a senior counsel to make an undertaking which is reflected in your lordship’s ruling, we crave your lordship to give effect to that undertaking by A.A. Ibrahim, SAN, to produce the defendant.

“If you look at the so-called medical report attached, it is only asking for the period of six and eight weeks within which the defendant will be arrested and that the eight weeks had expired on June 9, 2026.

“I plead with your lordship that the court should not take the undertaking for granted. On our part, we have decided to give effect to the arrest of the first defendant. We also ask the counsel to the first defendant to cooperate and produce his client on the next adjournment to avoid a coercive power,” he said.

Responding, A.M. Lawal, who appeared for A.A. Ibrahim (SAN), urged the court to allow the lead counsel to personally address the issue of the alleged undertaking.

Mr Onwuegbuzie granted the request, stating that Mr Ibrahim should be given the opportunity to appear before the court and respond to the issue.

The application arose from a bench warrant issued against Ms Farouq on 16 April after she failed to appear for her scheduled arraignment alongside her co-defendants. Following her absence, the EFCC declared the former minister wanted over the alleged offences.

At earlier proceedings, her lawyers told the court that she was in Egypt receiving medical treatment and was medically unfit to attend the trial.

They subsequently applied to have the arrest warrant vacated, arguing that her absence was due to health challenges.

The EFCC opposed the application, contending that the former minister should first submit herself to the jurisdiction of the court before seeking any relief.

The prosecution also urged the court to discountenance the medical reports tendered by the defence and not allow further delays in the criminal proceedings.

The judge subsequently adjourned the case until 2 July for the arraignment of the defendants.

The Charges
Ms Umar-Farouq, who served as the pioneer Minister of Humanitarian Affairs, Disaster Management and Social Development during the former President Muhhamdu Bugari’s administration, and her co-defendants face 21 charges of breach of trust, abuse of office, fraudulent award of contract and conversion of public funds involving $1.3 million and N746,574,303.

EFCC alleged that the sum of $1.3 million was excess funds paid by the Ministry under National Social Safety Net Coordinating Office (NASSCO) for the validation of Rapid Response Register beneficiaries.

It said the money was meant to be refunded by the contractor, Social Development by Visual ICT Limited, to the to the ministry. But instead of refunding it, the prosecution alleged, Ms Umar-Farouq and Mr Alkali, then-permanent secretary of the ministry, converted it to their “personal benefit”.

EFCC, the prosecuting agency, alleged that the defendants committed the offences charged under section 315 of the Penal Code, between 8 May 2021 and 22 September 2022, while Ms Umar Farouq was serving as the minister overseeing the ministry.